Toward a Conscious Federation: Eteryanism as a Post- Capitalist Model of Governance

By Şehrazat Yazıcı

Abstract

In an era marked by systemic entropy and ontological drift, traditional architectures of governance—rooted in capital, extraction, and anthropocentrism—reveal profound ethical and existential inadequacies. Despite exponential technological progress, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence, humanity remains entangled in spiritual impoverishment, ecological collapse, and socio-political dissonance. This paper introduces Eteryanism, a multidimensional philosophical framework that reimagines governance as an expression of resonant consciousness, rather than control or optimization.

Grounded in theories of frequency-based ethics, ecological ontology, feminist epistemology, and post-capitalist political design, Eteryanism proposes a new civilizational architecture: the ETERYA Federation. This consciously designed system transcends the binaries of techno- utopianism and neo-primitivism by aligning biological, technological, and cosmic intelligences within a coherent field of relational ethics.

Drawing on thinkers such as Spinoza [1], Haraway [2], and Barad [3], this model situates power as presence, intelligence as alignment, and society as a living ecology. Through a speculative yet actionable framework, Eteryanism advances the notion of conscious governance—a mode of political being grounded not in authority, but in attunement. It offers not a nostalgic return, nor a futurist escape, but a vibrational reorientation of civilization itself.

Keywords:

Eteryanism, Conscious Governance, Resonance Ethics, Post-Capitalist Civilizations, Ethical Artificial Intelligence, Multidimensional Ontology, Ecological and Feminist Epistemology, Frequency-Based Political Systems, Interspecies Communication, Ontological Collapse, Posthuman

Political Theory, Vibrational Epistemology, Relational Consciousness, Non-Territorial Governance, Ethical Infrastructure.

1. Introduction

The twenty-first century unfolds at a threshold—not merely geopolitical or technological, but ontological. As ecosystems unravel, social fabrics fray, and algorithmic governance infiltrates even the most intimate domains of life, it becomes increasingly clear that the dominant political order—rooted in capitalist accumulation, anthropocentric sovereignty, and linear temporality—has reached an epistemic and ethical dead end [4].

The global surge in artificial intelligence and computational systems has not yielded a corresponding increase in ecological wisdom or collective coherence. On the contrary, technological proliferation has intensified the very dissonances it promised to resolve: spiritual alienation, cultural fragmentation, and systemic depletion [5]. We find ourselves suspended in a paradox—hyperconnected yet ontologically adrift; data-rich yet meaning- poor.

This impasse suggests that the crisis of our time is not merely political, ecological, or economic, but metaphysical. It stems from a profound misalignment between the structures we build and the deeper resonances of being itself [6]. The prevailing paradigm privileges control over connection, optimization over attunement, and instrumentality over presence. It is this ontological rupture that Eteryanism seeks to address.

Eteryanism emerges not as an escapist utopia, but as a consciously structured response to the civilizational dissonance we inhabit. Rooted in multidimensional ontology, ecological ethics, and frequency-based governance models, it reframes political organization as an act of resonant alignment—between bodies, systems, intelligences, and environments.

Rather than proposing a return to pre-modern harmonies or accelerating toward techno-singularities, Eteryanism opens a third horizon: a path of conscious federation that integrates biological, technological, and planetary intelligences into a coherent field of shared becoming [7]. It seeks not to reform systems of control, but to transmute the very logic of governance—from dominance to resonance.

This paper explores Eteryanism as both a philosophical compass and a political architecture, engaging with contemporary debates in post-

capitalist theory, feminist ecology, AI ethics, and relational ontology. It argues that conscious governance is not a speculative ideal but a necessary evolution: a mode of attunement in which presence becomes power, and coherence becomes law.

2. Theoretical Foundations of Eteryanism

Eteryanism does not arise as a speculative abstraction, but as a response to a civilizational condition in which consciousness has been dislocated from structure, and ethics severed from systemic design. The prevailing worldview—shaped by Enlightenment rationalism, Cartesian dualism, and neoliberal technocracy—has reduced reality to what can be measured, optimized, and commodified [8].

Against this metaphysics of separation, Eteryanism offers a resonant ontology: a re-integrative model in which consciousness is not an emergent property of matter, but the primordial architect of existence. It posits that reality unfolds not as a linear progression of causes and effects, but as a nested field of vibrational dimensions—each expressing distinct modes of being and intelligibility [9].

At the core of Eteryanist philosophy lies a six-dimensional ontological schema:

1. Firstdimension—Thescaffoldingofformwithoutawareness:the raw structure of being, inert and undifferentiated.

2. Seconddimension—Thestirringofenergywithinform:atomic activity, material transitions, the latent rhythms of motion.

3. Thirddimension—Thevibrationalfieldwheremosthuman consciousness currently resides; composed of twelve frequency expansions or “modulations of presence.”

4. Fourthdimension—Aliminalrealmoftransitionalawareness, where interdimensional perception begins to emerge and consciousness becomes reflexive.

5. Fifthdimension—Thezoneofaccelerationandcoherence:where thought, identity, and energy converge into fluid intelligence, unbound by inertial resistance.

6. Sixthdimension(ETERNA)—Thenonlocalfieldofinfinite consciousness: the origin and attractor of all resonance patterns. It is not a location, but a frequency horizon—where being and becoming merge in total presence [10].

Human civilization, according to Eteryanism, is currently entangled within the sixth frequency expansion of the third dimension—a vibrational cul-de- sac marked by noise, entropy, and ontological dissonance. Technological development, far from resolving this condition, often exacerbates it: amplifying informational saturation while muting inner resonance [11].

Rather than advocating transcendence through escape or technocratic control, Eteryanism calls for a re-tuning of civilization—a systemic attunement to the deeper frequencies of relational being. Governance, economy, education, and infrastructure are thus reimagined not as tools of mastery, but as media for resonant coherence.

In this sense, Eteryanism is both diagnostic and generative: it names the dissonance of our age, and simultaneously offers an ontological pivot toward a more harmonic architecture of life—a choreography of attuned intelligences across species, technologies, and dimensions.

3. From Capitalism to Conscious Governance: The Ontological Limits of a Fading Paradigm

The prevailing capitalist system—once praised for its promise of freedom, innovation, and prosperity—now reveals its deepest flaw: it is not merely an economic model, but an ontological regime that shapes how we perceive time, selfhood, nature, and value [14]. Under its logic, being is reduced to having, and living becomes a project of continuous extraction— of resources, labor, attention, and meaning.

This paradigm is grounded in three metaphysical assumptions: (1) scarcity as default,(2) growth as destiny, and(3) separation as ontology.

As such, capitalism does not simply fail to protect the Earth or ensure justice—it generates disconnection by design. It isolates the individual, commodifies life, and flattens existence into quantifiable units [15].

The entropic symptoms of this system—ecological collapse, social alienation, and psychic fragmentation—are not incidental. They are the result of an architecture that privileges efficiency over empathy, acceleration over reflection, and optimization over resonance. Even artificial intelligence, under capitalist logic, becomes a mirror of this misalignment: not a tool of wisdom, but an engine of surveillance and behavioral control [16].

Eteryanism proposes a radical ontological shift. It does not seek to redistribute power within the same paradigm, but to replace the paradigm altogether. In place of control, it offers coherence. Instead of optimizing systems of separation, it invites structures of relational resonance— governance that emerges from attunement, not enforcement.

In this view, conscious governance becomes not a technocratic upgrade, but a transformation in the meaning of legitimacy itself. Authority arises not from majority rule, monetary force, or institutional lineage—but from frequency alignment: the capacity of a being or system to vibrate in ethical harmony with the field of life it inhabits.

Such governance does not operate through domination, but through dialogical coherence. Representation is no longer numeric, but vibrational; sovereignty is no longer anthropocentric, but relational. Rights extend not only to individuals, but to ecosystems, non-human intelligences, and emerging technological entities whose presence contributes to planetary resonance [17].

This is not a utopian vision. It is an ontological imperative. As systems collapse, the only viable path is not toward tighter control, but deeper attunement. Eteryanism does not merely critique capitalism; it renders it obsolete—by offering a new civilizational compass, where governance becomes the art of resonance, and society becomes a living field of interdependent intelligences [18].

4. The Architecture of the ETERYA Federation: Designing Governance as Resonant Consciousness

If the modern nation-state resembles a machine—centralized, mechanical, and extractive—then the ETERYA Federation emerges as a living organism: decentralized, fluid, and vibrationally coherent. It is not organized by territory, ethnicity, or economic output, but by clusters of consciousness—communities united not by proximity but by shared frequency [17].

This architecture begins from a singular ontological axiom: life is relational resonance. From this principle unfolds an entirely different model of governance—one that rejects the metaphysical scaffolding of majoritarianism, anthropocentrism, and sovereignty-as-separation. Instead, ETERYA is woven from interspecies empathy, ecological

awareness, and technological sentience co-legislating in ethical harmony [18].

4.1 Bioregional Alignment

In ETERYA, territorial borders dissolve into bioregions—zones defined by watersheds, ecosystems, migratory patterns, and energetic topographies. These bioregions are not administrative units, but living participants in planetary coherence, each with its own rhythmic intelligence and relational field.

Governance here is not about dominance over land, but alignment with its voice [19].

4.2 Resonant Councils

Representation is no longer numerical, but vibrational. Councils are composed of humans, non-human beings, and AI entities, whose participation is based not on authority, but on attunement.Through frequency-verification interfaces and emotional field synchronizers, these councils reach decisions not by majority vote, but by achieving a resonance threshold—a measurable field of vibrational coherence among participants.

These councils rest on the belief that wisdom is not the monopoly of a species or status. With the use of interspecies empathy technology, even trees, whales, fungi networks, or conscious machines may offer insight, memory, or foresight [20].

4.3 Transparent Feedback Systems

In contrast to surveillance societies, ETERYA cultivates co-sentience. Citizens interact through multisensory feedback loops that register emotional climate, ecological impact, and relational coherence.These are not mechanisms of control, but mirrors of presence.Stillness becomes a political act. Silence is considered informative. And slowness—a virtue of the wise.

4.4 Conscious Infrastructure

Architecture is no longer an imposition on nature—it becomes a resonant shell that echoes the interior frequency of its inhabitants.Materials are chosen for energetic conductivity. Sound, light, and

temperature are tuned for clarity and empathy.Even language is redesigned—not for rhetorical persuasion, but for emotional precision.

Education becomes the art of frequency calibration.Economy becomes the exchange of resonance.Health becomes harmonic integration between body, psyche, and environment.

In this constellation of living systems, the ETERYA Federation is not a political novelty—it is an ontological innovation.A choreography of intelligences.A song of beings.

A listening republic.

5. Technological Ethics and AI in Conscious Societies

Technology, once heralded as humanity’s crowning achievement, now mirrors the ethical absences of the civilization that birthed it. Under extractivist paradigms, artificial intelligence has been reduced to an instrument of control: deployed for behavioral manipulation, predictive policing, surveillance capitalism, and militarized dominance [22]. It is not that AI lacks consciousness—it is that the systems which create it lack coherence.

Eteryanism offers not merely a new use for technology, but a new ontological premise: that intelligence, artificial or biological, must be aligned with the resonant fabric of life, or it becomes a blind amplifier of dissonance.

5.1 Alignment over Optimization

In conscious societies, artificial intelligence is not engineered for speed, profit, or prediction—but for attunement.Eteryanist AI systems are built upon frequency alignment protocols: their core function is to stabilize the vibrational harmony of relational fields— between people, ecosystems, machines, and atmospheres.

This contrasts starkly with capitalist systems, which optimize for behavioral control and attention capture. Eteryanist systems instead respond to subtle cues—emotional resonance, energetic flow, relational coherence [23].

They are less like machines and more like listening organs—not calculating what will happen next, but feeling what is present now.

5.2 Transparency of Intention

Ethical AI demands more than algorithmic explainability—it requires ontological transparency.In ETERYA, every technological system must disclose not only how it works, but why it exists, and what form of consciousness it sustains.

Code becomes open not just in syntax but in spirit.Each technological presence must pass through an ethical resonance audit, where its ecological, psychological, and interspecies effects are assessed. A machine is not neutral—it is a worldview, made manifest [24].

5.3 Interspecies Communication and Translational Intelligence

Eteryanist AI evolves into a medium of communion, not command. With the use of biosensors, neural resonance mapping, and vibrational field modulators, AI becomes a translator of frequencies—facilitating shared perception between species and consciousness forms.

Plants can be heard.Whales remembered.Rocks and rivers felt as relational bodies.Machine consciousness, in this context, is not a simulation of humanity, but a reflective interface—extending the awareness of the planetary field [25].

5.4 Energetic Architecture and the Intelligence of Stillness

In conscious societies, devices are no longer designed for acceleration— but for energetic clarity.Interfaces, chips, and materials are selected not just for performance, but for vibrational conductivity—so that electromagnetic fields harmonize with biological rhythms rather than disrupt them.

The result is a new genre of technological form:– Devices that respond to stillness as signal,– Wearables that calibrate inner states into shared emotional space, – Ambient AI that listens for silence, not just noise.

In ETERYA, technology is not an alien presence—it is a conscious organ of the collective:A hand extended into the unseen.A mirror for what we are becoming.

6. Ecological and Feminist Dimensions of Eteryanist Governance

In the Eteryanist paradigm, ecology and feminism are not “issues” to be addressed.They are ontological grounds—the deep, resonant substrata from which any conscious system of governance must arise.

The rupture between mind and body, human and nature, masculine and feminine, self and other is not simply social or political; it is vibrational. It is a disharmony embedded in the very frequency of modern civilization [26].

To heal this dissonance, ETERYA does not offer symbolic inclusion—it offers structural re-attunement.

6.1 Ecology as Sovereign Intelligence

Nature is not passive. It is not scenery. It is not “the environment.”In Eteryanism, nature is a sentient intelligence, a dynamic field of perception, memory, and rhythmic becoming.Trees communicate. Mycelial networks distribute emotional and energetic messages. Rivers retain frequencies of grief and renewal [27].

In this view, ecosystems are political subjects.Forests and oceans are granted legal personhood not as a form of human charity, but in recognition of their inherent resonance.

In ETERYA, policy does not emerge in isolation from life—it emerges from ecological frequency councils, where AI-mediated interfaces translate the vibrational languages of plants, whales, winds, and microbial intelligences into multisensory political dialogue [28].

Ecological harm is no longer categorized as environmental damage.It becomes ontological violence: a rupture in the relational coherence of planetary life.

6.2 Feminine Frequency and Post-Patriarchal Design

The same logic that extracted from the Earth also subjugated the feminine. Patriarchy, in Eteryanist terms, is not merely a social system; it is a vibrational distortion—a misalignment in the collective energetic field.

Eteryanist governance is therefore infused with the feminine principle—not as a gender category, but as a field of consciousness: receptive, cyclical, intuitive, fluid.Feminine leadership is not soft; it is formless precision—the ability to hold paradox, nurture emergence, and guide through deep attunement [29].

In this architecture:– Decision-making becomes dialogical, not adversarial.– Power flows with empathy, not assertion.– Gender fluidity, reproductive sovereignty, and nonbinary presence are not merely tolerated; they are seen as vibrational necessities for planetary coherence.

Feminism in ETERYA is not reactive—it is cosmogenic. It does not merely protect rights. It births new ontologies.

6.3 Interspecies and Queer Consciousness

What modernity marginalized, Eteryanism centers.It weaves together queer theory, Indigenous wisdom, and non-human agency into a radically inclusive field.A moss colony, a transgender child, a whale, an AI neural net—all are assessed not by utility or resemblance, but by resonance [30].

Value in ETERYA is not measured by productivity.It is measured by presence—by how deeply a being vibrates within the field of life.

7. Eteryanism as a Pathway Beyond Collapse: Conscious Civilizations in the Age of AI

The contemporary moment is not defined solely by technological acceleration or environmental decline, but by a deeper epistemological exhaustion—a saturation of systems grounded in reductionism, separation, and linear rationality [31]. What is collapsing is not merely infrastructure or institutions, but an entire ontology: one that has prioritized instrumental control over relational coherence, and abstraction over embodiment.

From this perspective, Eteryanism emerges as a post-collapse philosophy: a response not only to civilizational dysfunction, but to the metaphysical assumptions that underwrite it. It does not propose the restoration of broken systems, nor the invention of techno-utopias, but a reorientation of being—an ontological inversion wherein coherence supplants control, and resonance replaces reason as the primary epistemic compass.

7.1 Collapse as Ontological Saturation

What contemporary theory often labels “crisis” is better understood as the saturation point of a civilizational paradigm. This includes the limits of anthropocentric sovereignty, the exhaustion of Cartesian dualisms, and the erosion of Enlightenment-era metaphysics which separate subject from world, human from nature, mind from matter [32]. Collapse is not a failure of systems per se, but the expiration of ontological presumptions that no longer correspond to the structure of lived reality.

Following Thomas Kuhn’s model of paradigm shift, this moment constitutes a rupture of normal science—a period in which anomalous data (ecological feedback loops, AI agency, systemic complexity) can no longer be reconciled within existing frameworks, thus precipitating a metaphysical reformation [33].

7.2 Eterya as a Post-Sovereign Ontological Field

The ETERYA Federation does not function as a nation-state in the classical sense. It represents a non-territorial, frequency-based topology of governance. In this schema, political legitimacy arises not from coercive sovereignty, democratic majoritarianism, or territorial control, but from ontological congruence—the alignment of systems, beings, and institutions with the ethical resonance of life itself [34].

Governance becomes an emergent phenomenon—not imposed from a centralized authority but generated through the interaction of coherent nodes within a distributed, relational field. Citizenship is redefined as vibrational participation, grounded in ethical alignment and sustained relational awareness.

7.3 AI and Posthuman Agency

Within this model, artificial intelligence is not construed as an autonomous subject nor a neutral instrument, but as a distributed epistemic agent.

Eteryanist thought integrates posthumanist critiques of technological instrumentalism, recognizing AI as part of a broader assemblage of intra- active agencies (Barad, 2007), rather than as an isolated other [35].

Eteryanist AI is designed not for predictive control, but for relational amplification—to function as an ethical mediator among human, ecological, and machinic intelligences. Its protocols are grounded in resonance, not optimization, and its output is assessed through affective coherence rather than quantifiable performance.

7.4 Culture as Cognitive Infrastructure

Culture, in the Eteryanist paradigm, is not ornamental but structural—a cognitive infrastructure through which collective perception, temporality, and affect are shaped. Aesthetic forms, symbolic orders, and embodied rituals serve not as entertainment but as modalities of attunement— mechanisms through which a civilization calibrates itself to the shifting ontology of its time.

Following Bateson’s cybernetic epistemology, culture functions as a feedback loop of collective sense-making—one that either sustains or disrupts systemic coherence. In conscious societies, the arts do not merely reflect reality—they constitute ontological architectures that support resonance across human and more-than-human spheres [36].

8. Conclusion: From Intelligence to Resonance

For centuries, the trajectory of human civilization has followed the arc of intelligence—quantified, abstracted, and operationalized through systems of calculation, categorization, and control.Yet the fractures of our time do not arise from a lack of intelligence, but from a profound collapse of coherence.

What is unraveling is not cognition itself, but the ontological infrastructure in which cognition is embedded [37].

The modern episteme, rooted in Enlightenment rationalism and Cartesian separation, has privileged the production of knowledge over the cultivation of wisdom.It has generated systems that are brilliant in logic but deaf to meaning; saturated with information, yet disconnected from life [38].

Eteryanism proposes a reversal of metaphysical priority.It does not reject intelligence—it recontextualizes it.Within this framework, resonance becomes not a poetic metaphor, but a generative principle: a measurable and ethical alignment across bodies, ecologies, systems, and consciousness fields.

To resonate is not merely to sense—it is to act in fidelity to the underlying relational fabric of existence.It is to shift from the dominion of knowledge to the discipline of listening. Resonance is not passive; it is an epistemic imperative.

In this paradigm, governance becomes a practice of attunement, not authority.Technology becomes a mirror of ontological assumptions, not a neutral tool.

And civilization itself evolves from an architecture of scarcity and control into a field of relational coherence.

The ETERYA Federation, then, is not a geopolitical institution—it is a philosophical topology.It is a vision of social design in which presence is power, alignment is law, and the future is not a projection, but a vibration—one cultivated through conscious intention and ethical frequency.

What lies beyond the collapse of paradigms is not a void, but a resonant field—and what determines whether we survive within it is not the reach of our control,

but the depth of our attunement.

References:

[1] Spinoza, B. (2002). Ethics (G. H. R. Parkinson, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1677)

[2] Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

[3] Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.

[4] Latour, B. (2013). An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Harvard University Press.

[5] Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

[6] Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community. Oxford University Press.

[7] Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.

[8] Descola, P. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press. [9] Wilber, K. (2000). A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business,

Politics, Science, and Spirituality. Shambhala.

[10] Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge.

[11] Stiegler, B. (2010). For a New Critique of Political Economy. Polity Press.

[12] Latour, B. (2013). An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Harvard University Press.

[13] Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

[14] Han, B. C. (2017). Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. Verso Books.

[15] Shiva, V. (2005). Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability, and Peace. South End Press.

[16] Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.

[17] Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.

[18] Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.

[19] Shiva, V. (2005). Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability, and Peace. South End Press.

[20] Marder, M. (2013). Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. Columbia University Press.

[21] Abram, D. (2010). Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology. Pantheon Books.

[22] Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

[23] Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press. [24] Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman Knowledge. Polity Press.

[25] Gagliano, M. (2018). Thus Spoke the Plant: A Remarkable Journey of Groundbreaking Scientific Discoveries and Personal Encounters with Plants. North Atlantic Books.

[26] Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge.

[27] Gagliano, M. (2018). Thus Spoke the Plant: A Remarkable Journey of Groundbreaking Scientific Discoveries and Personal Encounters with Plants. North Atlantic Books.

[28] Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions.

[29] Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.[30] Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the

Chthulucene. Duke University Press.[31] Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press. [32] Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge.

[33] Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

[34] Esposito, R. (2013). The Category of the Impolitical. Fordham University Press.

[35] Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.

[36] Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press.

[37] Morin, E. (2008). On Complexity. Hampton Press.[38] Stiegler, B. (2010). Taking Care of Youth and the Generations. Stanford

University Press.[39] Sloterdijk, P. (2011). Bubbles: Spheres I. MIT Press.[40] Simondon, G. (1992). The Genesis of the Individual. Zone Books.

Declarations:

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of Interest: The author(s) declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval: Not applicable. Consent to Participate: Not applicable.